Television programmes [2]

Pettytyrant101 wrote:I can just as easily say you have no right to suggest you have any stress when there are people that are prisoners of group like ISIS who have had their family killed and are actively being raped and tortured until they die from it. - Lance

{{yes but I wouldnt agrue the two were equal or even comparable as stress levels. i wouldnt talk about a slight over an article of clothing as being stress. Thats some pampered git there if thats your idea of stress in life.


LB - how many little things set you off when everything else is tough and that is the little thing that you snap on? That is a silly comment, especially since they were talking about wedding arrangements which are often stressful in themselves.

'Second, you have no idea what it is like being in the inside of an institution like that and the pressures that exist for them.'

Nope I dont. But I'll tell you who does, Harry. Yet she said she was unprepared and niave about the protocols and expectations and duties, then thats his fault and hers. How on earth you can enter something like the royal family and not know how difficult a life of duty and service in the public eye can be beggars belief, especially when your husband has been in that position their entire life.
I dont believe for one second she didnt know what she was getting into, no one is that stupid it doent add up.

LB - being told (which I agree, would be surprising if she didn't have a little idea) is very different from experiencing and dealing with the reality.

'The tabloids clearly made her a target (and they definitely used her heritage as part of that) in order to sell papers. '

They equally poured over Dianas heritage, her entire bloodline back to the Normans and even if she was a virgin or not in the tabloid press. Megans treatment is not race based its tabloid dealing with Royal based. You either play the game- Wills and Kate perfect example they have a deal with press no one sneaks photos of them or  especially their kids with paprazzi an din return they will dutifully turn out at regular intervals with the kids for a photo op for the tabloids. You bitch whine and set up a fight with UK tabloids they will tear you to pieces, regardless of your colour. Its how they have always operated.

LB - have you seen some of the fucking vile coverage of Meghan? Some of it was clearly race relates while other was very personal and was that was from the beginning. There are examples of literally exactly the same situation in which Kate and Meghan were dealt with completely different... one the nations sweetheart and the other the evil bitch. Comparing the two is a great example of how this is not the same situation.

'I am sure you listened when they said that security of their family and the title came hand in hand.'

Yes and under not 1 but 2 UK laws they were entitled to neither. Security comes with a title and under a rule put in by George VI someone that far from the throne doesnt get a title and therefore doesnt get  tax payer security. Nothing to do with who they are, nothing to do with her skin colour as she heavily implied, its the rules for everyone whose more than a few steps from the ruling position.
They are also filthy rich by their own means and can easily afford their own security, why should the tax payer give them security money they are not enittled by law to recieve? Yet a poor person who needs a pitiful handout that is our benefits system to live on gets called a scrounger, worskshy and lazy. But they think they are entirtled to hundreds of thousands of tax money for their kids security when they have the means themselves?

LB - poor people being brought in to the conversation has nothing to do with it. What does is that Harry, as a Prince and a position he was born in to had his security removed. The issue with Archie is that they were also told that the protection under which he would would received the security under the article you mention (I.e. the Queen dies) was also going to be removed when it hadn't for anyone else. Last, security is very expensive and quickly drains even substantial amounts of money, maybe you should look up what it takes to get good quality, round the clock security for a very high profile target.



As to her mental health- Harry was the head of the charity for mental health! He couldnt have helped his own wife, put her touch with people from that organisation who could have helped her? Spoken to his own family about it in private? Where was he during all this? Doing nothing for her it seems.

LB - according to them they did ask the institution for help and were told no. They were also told they could not seek help outside of the institution. They were told to suck it up because "that's just the way it is."

Harry inherited 14million from Diana, which was then invested for him so probably at least double that now, and your saying they have to go trash talk their own family publicly to make ends meet? No fucking chance. Live a simpler life if you have to but if you cant live a 'normal private' life with 14 million in the bank you beyond hope.
And as i pointed out there are senior royals you almost never hear or see from, like Prince Edward- he does his suty, he makes his appearences as necessary and required and thats it. It is quite possible to be a senior Royal and not be in the spotlight all the time. The problem arises when like Diana you want to be in the tabloids and the press and court them with interviews and the like, then complain during them your hounded by the press!
If they wanted anonimity and a quiet life why did they move to LA? Why sign deals with netflix and Oprah to trash talk your own? How is that getting out the spotlight?

LB - Well, this comes back to the whole security thing. They were cut off financially from the Royal Family and then had to deal with getting a new home that was secure etc and they wanted to be able to actually still interact with the world, not become hermits in the Rockies.

Plus we know they lie. Hary claimed that they were going ecofriendly, and that all the flights he and his family had taken in recent months were commercial- then it leaked that 8 out of the last 10 flights they took were on a private plane. Bare faced lie in order to create a false public perception and narrative around themselves.
I dont see whats so different about this interview- seems like more lies, exaggerations and whining about trivia in order to manipulate the media narrative into seeing them as victims. Whilst coincidentally giving them limelight, a massive audience and amount of media attention and a huge wad of cash. Odd way to stay out the public eye!}}